Shaping Common Ground in Neurotech Regulation and Governance
16 February__ 17 February > 2025
The rise and promise of neurotechnology—extending beyond clinical applications to contexts such as the workplace, education, commerce, recreation, and the military—has sparked significant academic debates and regulatory initiatives. These efforts seek to harness the immense opportunities offered by neurotechnology while safeguarding fundamental rights and freedoms.
Central concerns in these debates and initiatives include the protection of neural circuitry and the forum internum of human thought, as well as ensuring non-discrimination in access to and use of neurotechnology
From a regulatory standpoint, notable initiatives have already been undertaken not only by individual countries (e.g., Chile, Mexico, and the United States) but also by regional and international organizations such as UNESCO, the UN Human Rights Council, the OECD, the OAS, and the Council of Europe. These are undoubtedly important milestones, yet further progress is required to build a regulatory framework that ensures certainty and security in response to the global challenges posed by neurotechnology.
The objective of the 1st CINET Neurotechnology Conference is to bring together leading academics, members of the neurotechnology industry, and representatives of international organizations to share their experiences and perspectives, highlight pending challenges and gaps, and define the next steps in the ongoing effort to establish a robust regulatory and governance framework for neurotechnology.
From conceptual, ethical, and legal perspectives, four major axes of discussion remain controversial and await both academic and regulatory consensus:
Whether protection of the privacy of the forum internum should be achieved by regulating only neural data, or also biometric data capable of inferring mental states (i.e., cognitive biometric data).
How the principle of mental integrity should be understood, how it relates to the rights to physical and psychological integrity, and what kinds of neurotechnological intrusions may erode this right.
The scope of protection afforded by the right to cognitive liberty, particularly in its relationship to freedom of thought, and whether it should merely shield individuals from neurotechnological intrusions or also guarantee their freedom to use neurotechnology for self-enhancement.
Whether equitable access to neurotechnology should be prioritized exclusively for medical and clinical purposes, or whether proactive public policies should also promote access for cognitive enhancement, for example in education or employment.
Opening Remarks
9:00 – 9:30 am
Teodoro Sánchez-Ávila Sánchez-Migallón
Álvaro Matud
Javier Bernácer
José M. Muñoz

Intrusions into the Mind: The Rights to Mental Privacy and Mental Integrity
9:30 – 11:00 am
Jennifer Chandler
Philipp Kellmeyer
Harry Lambert
José M. Muñoz (discussant)

Neurotech Governance: Perspectives from Industry
11:30 – 13:00 pm
Luis Montesano
Carolina Aguilar
Ignacio Saez
Irene Blázquez (discussant)

Cognitive Liberty and the Forum Internum: From Freedom of Thought to the Right to Enhance Our Mental Capabilities
14:30 – 15:30 pm
Marcello Ienca
Christoph Bublitz
José M. Muñoz (discussant)

Prelude
9:00 – 9:15 am
Judy Illes

The Role of States, Regional Bodies, and Global Institutions in the Regulation of Neurotechnology
9:15 – 10:30 am
Dafna Feinholz
Milena Costas Trascasas
Limor Shmerling
Ramiro Orias
José Manuel Muñoz (moderator)

Regulation and Governance of Neurotechnology: What’s Next?
11:00 – 12:30 pm
All the speakers Chaired by José M. Muñoz
Closing Remarks
12:30 – 12:45 pm
Participants
Carolina Aguilar
CEO at INBRAIN
Christoph Bublitz
University of Hamburg
Dafna Feinholz
UNESCO Chief of Bioethics and Ethics of Science and Technology
Harry Lambert
Founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology and Law
Ignacio Saez
Mount Sinai New York
Irene Blázquez
Director of IE University’s Center for the Governance of Change
Javier Bernácer
Scientific Director of CINET
Jennifer Chandler
University of Ottawa
José Manuel Muñoz
Principal Investigator at CINET
Judy Illes
University of British Columbia
Laurence Lwoff
Council of Europe
Limor Shmerling
OECD
Luis Montesano
CTO at Bitbrain
Marcello Ienca
Technical University of Munich
Milena Costas Trascasas
UN Human Rights Council Advisory Committee
Philipp Kellmeyer
University of Mannheim, University Medical Center Freiburg
Ramiro Orias
Rapporteur of the Inter-American Declaration on Neurotechnology of the IJC/OAS



